An Example of a Theorem that has Contradictory Relativization and Diagonalization Proof
نویسنده
چکیده
The central questions in complexity theory (e.g. the P =?NP question) can only be solved with proof techniques that do not relativize [BGS75]. There had been some debate about whether such techniques are within reach of the “current state of mathematics” [Hop84]. Recent advances in the area of interactive protocols have produced techniques that do not relativize [Sha90, LFKN90, HCRR90]. However, these advances do not resolve the debate on whether diagonalization can be used to solve problems that have contradictory relativizations [BGS75, Koz80]. In the following, we give an example of a theorem that has contradictory relativizations and a diagonalization proof.
منابع مشابه
Some Observations about Relativization of Space Bounded Computations
In this column we explore what relativization says about space bounded computations and what recent results about space bounded computations say about relativization. There is a strong belief in computational complexity circles that problems which can be relativized in two contradictory ways are very hard to solve. We believe that such problems can only be solved by proof techniques that do not...
متن کاملDiagonal arguments and fixed points
A universal schema for diagonalization was popularized by N.S. Yanofsky (2003), based on a pioneering work of F.W. Lawvere (1969), in which the existence of a (diagonolized-out and contradictory) object implies the existence of a fixed-point for a certain function. It was shown that many self-referential paradoxes and diagonally proved theorems can fit in that schema. Here, we fi...
متن کاملBarriers in Complexity Theory
Several proof methods have been successfully employed over the years to prove several important results in Complexity Theory, but no one has been able to settle the question P =?NP. This article surveys three of the main proof methods used in Complexity Theory, and then shows that they cannot be used to prove P =?NP, thus exposing technical barriers to the advance of Complexity Theory. The firs...
متن کاملThe Basic Theorem and its Consequences
Let T be a compact Hausdorff topological space and let M denote an n–dimensional subspace of the space C(T ), the space of real–valued continuous functions on T and let the space be equipped with the uniform norm. Zukhovitskii [7] attributes the Basic Theorem to E.Ya.Remez and gives a proof by duality. He also gives a proof due to Shnirel’man, which uses Helly’s Theorem, now the paper obtains a...
متن کاملFREE SEMIGROUPS AND IDEMPOTENTS IN T
The known theory for an oid T shows how to find a subset T of ?T, which is a compact right topological semigroup [I]. The success of the methods in [2] for obtaining properties of-T has prompted us to see how successful they would be in another context. Thus we find (Theorem 4.8) that T cont ains copies of free semigroups on 2? generators, is an immediate consequence of the stronger resu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Bulletin of the EATCS
دوره 42 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1990